Rep. Scott Garrett (NJ) questions OMB Acting Director Jeffrey Zients at the House Budget Committee on February 15, 2012.
Author: Peter Weldon
The Great Conceit
February 8, 2012
The Obama administration has ordered that all health insurance must cover the full cost of certain female preventative health services including contraceptives for free; no deductibles, no co-pays, nothing, free.
See this explanation from the Whitehouse Press Secretary.
See related Wall Street Journal Editorial.
See Wall Street Journal Opinion piece in Defense of the Mandate.
The media thinks the controversy is over non-profits having to comply with this order, including religiously affiliated universities and hospitals. I think there is a deeper problem, conceit.
The explanation of the policy boils down to Mr. Obama’s belief that all people who pay for health insurance coverage must subsidize free services including contraceptives for those women who want them.
Should the government require all people who pay for health insurance coverage to subsidize free blood pressure medicines for those people who want them?
Should the government require all people who pay for health insurance coverage to subsidize free Weight Watchers programs for those people who want them?
Should the government require all people who pay for health insurance coverage to subsidize free smoking cessation programs for those people who want them?
Should the government require all people who pay for health insurance coverage to subsidize free abortions for those women who want them?
Recently, but before the Greek reality check, some European Union official was proposing that every citizen should have vacations at five star resorts subsidized by taxpayers. Really!
What is going on here? Why are we, as health insurance customers, being required to subsidize free stuff and why shouldn’t each of us pay the fair market price for health insurance that covers what we want it to cover? Where are the limits of what government will mandate as free stuff?
The government should have one simple rule requiring all people to pay for what they wanted out of their own pockets. If some people wish to subsidize free stuff for some people they can start a 501(c)3 non-profit, solicit voluntary contributions and distribute the money to those whose wishes they choose to serve. What we have now is forced government charity using your money.
As Woody Allen has noted, when you are sure you are right you will have a moral obligation to impose your will upon those who disagree with you, that is, if you have no understanding of individual liberty and responsibility and no understanding of the proper role of limited government.
These mandates simply reflect conceit exercising political power.
Believe in the Entrepreneur
December 20, 2011
Here is a video every government employee needs to see. The founder of RyanAir at a Brussels “Innovation” conference, December 2011:
__
Occupy Thyself With Responsibility
November 1, 2011
I had earphones pumping music into my head today while working out. On came a Huey Lewis song that got my attention with this lyric; “Takin’ what their givin’ cuz I’m workin’ for a livin’.”
It seems we have people occupying physical space in various cities instead of occupying themselves with work. I wonder how they pay their cell phone bills, not to mention paying for food, clothing, and shelter.
Some complain that they have college degrees and college loans outstanding but can’t find work, well, at least work commensurate with their expectations. I suggest as someone who has been both an employee and an employer that including your “occupy” this or that experience on your resume does not improve your competitiveness in the job market, for any kind of job.
A job exists, by definition, because people voluntarily want to exchange money they earn from their job for a product or service a person or organization produces. A job, by definition, is a defined set of tasks and responsibilities expected to be performed in exchange for pay and other possible benefits to produce a product or service. To work, by definition, is to accept a job. That is, you need to be Takin’ what their givin’ if you expect to be workin’ for a livin’.
Which brings us to Greece.
The majority political party in the Greek Parliament, at least as I write this, is the Panhellenic Socialist Movement party which has given the Greek people what they wanted but not what they can afford.
Greece is over €300 billion in debt and is in financial difficulties in part because successive Greek governments were found to have consistently and deliberately misreported the country’s official economic statistics to keep within the monetary union guidelines (rather than face the music earlier together with the Greek people). Short form, Greek governments lied to their lenders and now want to hold a referendum to see if the Greek people will agree to austerity measures imposed by the lenders they lied to. The other EU governments, by the way, are asking all private (not government) holders of Greek debt to take a 50% haircut on their principal, along with offering the Greek people more debt in exchange for more austerity measures. (If you are not laughing now you should be.)
Which brings us to responsibility.
The circumstance of the “occupiers” and of the Greek people confirm the reality that any socialist or statist government, democratic or not, will fail to effectively improve the lot of its citizens over the long term.
The “occupy” people need to take any job they can find, or create one for themselves.
The Greek people need to take a full haircut on their debt problems.
We need to stop making excuses and start “Takin’ what their givin’ cuz we’re workin’ for a livin’,” embracing both the risks and rewards of personal liberty and the responsibility that goes with it.
Post Script November 5, 2011: It now seems both Greek and European leaders wish to deny the right of the Greek people to vote on whether or not to accept the loans and austerity measures offered by Euro politicians. Fear of the consequences of a voter rejection is not an excuse to prevent a democratic voice on this most critical of issues for the Greek people. In the words of Hunter S. Thompson, you are either on the bus or off the bus. It is a great disappointment that the Greek people will not get to make this choice.
Also, it now seems the “occupy” people have lost control of their protests in some cities to those prone to violence (see: Oakland, CA). The theme of responsibility (and lack thereof) seems more and more relevant to the reality of what is being reported in the media. It is also of note that the tea party demonstrators waved their signs, voiced their concerns, voted accordingly and went back to work, leaving the sites of their demonstrations clean. (I am not a tea party participant, just being observant.)
Health, Wealth, and Freedom
December 20, 2010
Academic Hans Rosling offers this fascinating perspective on improving health and wealth creating better living standards worldwide. Which financial and political systems are responsible for the inventiveness and productivity that has led to such dramatic positive changes in worldwide health and wealth? Why has this happened?